The Honorable Harry Reid
Senate Majority Leader
United States Senate
322 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20310
Facsimile: (202) 224-7327
VIA U.S. MAIL & FACSIMILE
RE: “Count Us In”
Dear Majority Leader Reid:
By any measure, Texas is now “the ground zero” of health care in America. Texas has more uninsured than any state in the country. One out of four Texans—over six million—does not have health insurance. Not a single Texas city meets the national average in citizens covered with insurance—not Austin, not Dallas, not Houston. In fact, El Paso has more uninsured by percentage than any large city in the U.S. today. Contrary to the claims of some, even if non-citizens (who include legal residents as well as undocumented immigrants) were removed from the statewide estimate, Texas would still have the highest uninsured rate in the country with well over 4 million uninsured citizens. While our two U.S. Senators each compete to move from the right to the far right, they move further and further from what Texans want. Moreover, a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that the majority of Americans support the public option in particular. And if any state in the U.S. needs health reform, it’s the Lone Star state.
Consider this: one in six uninsured American children lives in Texas. We have 1.5 million uninsured children, more than any other state in percentage and total number. Many of these children are eligible currently for Medicaid and CHIP but not enrolled due to inadequate state agency funding.
Facing these alarming statistics, Governor Rick Perry, who is now in a close race with Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison to capture more of the far right fringe, chooses to play politics with children’s lives. Last regular session, when it looked likely that the popular Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was set to insure more Texas children via a bill filed by Senator Kip Averitt (R-Waco), Perry killed it by trumpeting to the media that he was opposed to any expansion of CHIP. That bill passed the Texas Senate by a vote of 29 to 2, but died in the House.
In 2003, Perry intentionally kicked over 230,000 Texas children out of CHIP and another half a million out of Medicaid. Then, he went to the Bahamas with Grover Norquist to brag about it. As you know, the federal government pays for the majority of CHIP. In Texas, for every total $1 spent on CHIP, the federal government pays 72 cents while the state pays the remaining 28 cents. So, instead of using the nearly $1 billion that the federal government set aside for Texans to expand CHIP to cover as many Texas children as possible, Gov. Perry sent scarce taxpayer dollars back to the federal government so that other states like Illinois could cover all of their children.
Perry’s failed leadership results in real life tragedies. According to a 2008 Families USA study based on U.S. Census Bureau data, approximately 2,700 uninsured Texans of working age died because they didn’t seek medical care. In other words, seven Texans a day died last year due to lack of health insurance.
Moreover, failed leadership on Texas health care is increasingly shifting health care costs to local taxpayers at county hospitals and clinics at the highest possible emergency room rates. In Dallas, Parkland Hospital provided $512 million in uncompensated care last year. In Houston, the Harris County Hospital District spent about $436 million.
Why is Texas so far behind when it comes to providing basic health care to more citizens? Because nowhere in America has Perry’s basic hostility to responsible governance become so engrained and been so costly to working families. Even President George W. Bush’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) refused to approve Rick Perry’s Medicaid waiver application because it simply redirects scarce DSH and UPL dollars from Texas hospitals, which already use it to fund care for millions of uninsured Texans, to instead fund his proposed Health Opportunity Pool (HOP).
The HOP is intended to provide private insurance to the uninsured parents of children enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP. However, after Perry’s administration released details as to how the HOP would work, consumer advocates expressed serious concerns as to the adequacy of the limited benefits and whether these low income Texans would even be able to afford the premiums. Hospitals in particular were concerned that Perry’s plan would end up costing them millions of dollars more. And because Perry didn’t reach an agreement with Bush’s CMS, negotiations of this waiver application ended when President Obama took office.
In other words, despite the illusion that Perry is hard at work trying to resolve the health care crisis in Texas, nothing has been done on this application since January. Perry’s tactic of robbing Peter to pay Paul—taking scarce direct care dollars to fund insurance companies in this case—is a tactic all too common in Republican health care plans.
The truth is that Texas can no longer afford to do nothing. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation recently released a report compiled by researchers from the Urban Institute who used their Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model to estimate how coverage and cost trends would change between now and 2019 if nothing is done to reform the current system. The report, entitled “The Cost of Failure to Enact Health Reform,” shows that within 10 years:
Sadly, our history in Texas over the last decade is this: unless the federal government by and through courts that enforce equal protection provisions of the U.S. Constitution aggressively step in—under this governor, the state government in Texas does the least possible to enforce a colorable claim to equal protection under federal minimum program requirements to protect a federal allocation—and never more. After nearly a decade under the leadership of Rick Perry, tax cuts for the wealthy trump care for kids, and resulting cuts to budgets rank Texas dead last in state per capita expenditures on our own citizens. All too often, the casualties are children and those in border regions and rural counties who can not afford to pay for an insurance policy that now costs almost twice as much as it did a decade ago. Over the years, from Medicaid to state services for the developmentally disabled to public education, we bear witness to government by lawsuit because that is the only refuge for those who seek equal protection under the law.
Here are some recent examples:
Frew v. Hawkins, a Medicaid class action lawsuit against the state of Texas, was filed in 1996. The plaintiffs sued the state for failing to provide adequate health care for children enrolled in Medicaid. The charges included poor screening, case management and outreach. Despite what seemed like an early resolution of the case with the state of Texas agreeing to improve children’s access to and awareness of the Medicaid Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment program, the state did not honor the consent decree and years of litigation followed. Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2000, the state persisted in its efforts, claiming that the consent decree could not be enforced because the state could not be sued. In early 2007, the case culminated when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case again. As a consequence, the state of Texas entered into a corrective action plan with the plaintiffs. The Legislature in 2007 had to provide significant increases in reimbursement rates for doctors and dentists (25 percent and 50 percent, respectively) as well as set aside $150 million each biennium for strategic initiatives intended to provide better, comprehensive health care to children enrolled in Medicaid. However, given that the state has only spent $16 million of the $150 million set aside for this biennium, the state might very well be in court again for failure to meet the requirements of the corrective action plan.
In another example of government by lawsuit, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been conducting a civil rights investigation of Texas’ state schools for the mentally retarded since early 2005. What started out as an investigation of one state school for abuses by direct care staff has broadened, first to another state school, and then the entire system. On December 1, 2008, the DOJ concluded that:
numerous conditions and practices at the Facilities violate the constitutional and federal statutory rights of residents. In particular, … the Facilities fail to provide consumers with adequate: (A) protection from harm; (B) training and associated behavioral and mental health services; © health care, including nutritional and physical management; (D) integrated supports and services and planning; and (E) discharge planning and placement in the most integrated setting.
The DOJ’s letter signified that the serious problems found initially at the Lubbock State School were not unique to one state school and indicative of systemic issues. The DOJ attributed these systemic issues to high staff attrition and vacancy rates for direct care staff and clinical professionals. Until the state can successfully train, supervise and retain their staff, we can not begin to address the problems and deficiencies identified by the DOJ.
Over and over, government by lawsuit is all that those of us who believe in government by and for all people have had to protect those whom the constitution binds us to protect. For many of us, health in Texas is the last frontier of civil rights, where the largest southern state continues to devalue the lives of minorities, the poor, and those most in need. In 2008, U.S. Senator John Cornyn showed just how out of touch he is when it comes to understanding the health care crisis in Texas. Despite the fact that Texas has led the country for years as the state with largest uninsured population, Senator Cornyn stated, “[w]e have created greater access to quality health care in Texas… [s]o, you have to understand what I mean when I say I want to make Washington, D.C., and the rest of our country more like Texas [because], frankly, we know the policies that actually work.”
Despite clear C.B.O. budget projections that H.R. 3962 will in fact lower the federal budget deficit by $104 billion over ten years, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and Governor Rick Perry continue to keep Texans from the truth. Just this week on KURV Radio in south Texas, Senator Hutchison called the bill “a government takeover of health care” that would lead to a single payer system. And of course, Hutchison, Perry and other Republicans continuously refer to current reform efforts as attempts to “socialize” medicine. Despite acknowledgement of our unsustainable, broken health care system, the sad reality is that most Republicans would rather trot out tired, old slogans than work on reform in a constructive manner. Many of these phrases were first used decades ago against Social Security and Medicare—programs that are vital to many Americans today.
That’s why we write you today to do right by Texas—and guarantee health care for all Texans. Now is the time for reality based, responsible leaders to act to reform a broken health care system—this is not the time for more posturing on right wing radio by those whose only record is more of “just say no.” Unless the federal government forces Texas to act, unless provisions in the Affordable Health Care for America Act are strong enough to deliver for all our citizens, Rick Perry will continue to leave one in four behind with the most vulnerable populations being denied access to basic health care.
Please do not allow Rick Perry to opt us out of access to quality care. For Texas’ sake, for our children and future, count us in.
Very truly yours,
cc: The Honorable Max Baucus, The Honorable Chris Dodd